Sunday, January 31, 2010

Anti-Mittal protest spills onto road



Anti-Mittal protest spills onto road
The land identified include community-owned natural resources as rivers, streams, forests, hills covering 10 villages in the Kamdarra block of Gumla. "This is a sheer repression of the rights of the tribals and the native inhabitants of the village. These villages are covered under the fifth schedule of the constitution, whereby the villagers enjoy traditional rights over such land," shot back Barla. 


Moushumi Basu | Ranchi

In a show of strength, Adivasi Moolvaasi Asthitva Raksha Manch (AMARM) protested against the proposed 12-MTPA steel plant in the State by the world steel giant ArcelorMittal. The protestors carrying banners, placards machetes, bow and arrow, and axe marched their way to the Circle office in Kamdara under Gumla district on Thursday. The march was led by vociferous tribal activist Dayamani Barla. 

The event assumes significance as it comes in the wake of the new Soren-led Government taking charge of the State. This was also followed by the recent meeting of the top brasses with the Chief-Minister, representing the world steel giant, in the State capital. It is also worthy to note that the successful show of strength could take place regardless of the fact that Paulus Surin has recently won from the neighbouring Torpa Assembly with a convincing margin of over 15,000 votes. 

Also, Chief Minister Shibu Soren too had recently assured Vijay Bhatnagar, CEO ArcelorMittal, of expediting their process of land acquisition, for their proposed steel plant of 12 MTPA in the twin districts of Khunti and Gumla, involving an investment of above Rs 40,000 crores. The MoU was signed with the State Government in 2005. However, the steel baron is yet to make headway in the State following hurdles in land acquisition. 

The Circle office in Kamdara was heavily crowded with the protestors from the villages around Kamdara in Gumla shouting slogans outside the office for more than three-four hours. "We will not part with an inch of our land…. Mittal Go back… We want grains and not iron…" shouted the protestors.

According to Barla, the rally was a part of the pre-scheduled programme, whereby the Assistant Collector had promised to meet them. 

"He has, however, cheated us and failed to appear as per his commitment," she asserted. However, later an eight point memorandum was handed to SDO Alok Shikari Kachchap. The members protested tooth and nail against the sale of 1025 acres of land by the Gumla district administration. 

The organisation demanded the immediate abrogation of such deeds where Mittals have been made raiyats (owners). "We would question the administration on the action taken by it on our demands, whose memoranda were submitted to the administration earlier," said Barla.

The land identified include community-owned natural resources as rivers, streams, forests, hills covering 10 villages in the Kamdarra block of Gumla. "This is a sheer repression of the rights of the tribals and the native inhabitants of the village. These villages are covered under the fifth schedule of the constitution, whereby the villagers enjoy traditional rights over such land," shot back Barla. 

Further, Section 46 of CNT Act clearly states that such land bearing natural resources are community land and cannot be touched without the consent of Gaon Sabha, pointed out the vociferous Barla. This has also been provided for in Khatiyan Part-2. "We will not part with even an inch of our land", reiterated the members.

It is in small, stray, isolated patches to the tune of 5 dismil, 10 dismil here and there crossing the village fields, Sarna Sthal, Sasandaris etc. Government does not consider it necessary to even refer the issue to the respective village committees. The officers come on their own and delineate the land, as though it is no man's land, she added

Meanwhile, their other demands include respecting the rights of Gaon Sabha and the transaction of the so-called Government land be stopped immediately. The provisions of the CNT Act should not be violated at any cost. The displacement of Adivasis and native population be stopped and the waters of the traditional rivers of the region, Koel, Karo and Chata be supplied to the farmers for the development of both agriculture and environment. The corporate companies would not be allowed to be made owners of their land. 


--
Priya Ranjan, Practicing Ph.D. in Internet Technologies

Official Internet Wanderer
दिलदार वेताल ऑफ़ इंद्रजाल :)


Sunday, January 17, 2010

Dhurwa tense as CISF jawans clash with displaced people.


Dhurwa tense as CISF jawans clash with displaced people.


Informing the incident Dayamani Barla, noted social activist said: "The hearing on this matter is going on in High Court, Ranchi on this issue. Before any final judgement of HC the jawans of CISF acquired the land and put tent there." 

Link to this page

Ranchi, Jan. 14 -- Tension gripped Dhurwa area in Ranchi, after Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) jawans clashed with the displaced people, injuring at least 20 persons, on Wednesday. The people were protesting against the acquisition of disputed land of Heavy Engineering Limited (HEC) at Murma village, by the CISF jawans six months ago. 

The injured have been admitted to the HEC hospital. 

Tension brewed up when some of the CISF jawans started destroying a Sarna Sthal (auspicious place for the tribals) which falls under the area of the makeshift camp installed by the jawans. The villagers alleged that they were insulting the Sarna flag. A group of around 10 women reached the spot and pleaded the jawans not to destroy the sacred place

Being irritated by the repeated requests of the women the jawans began beating them up. The spot was just some steps away from the protesting place where the villagers of 36 villages sat on dharna under the banner of Visthapit Morcha since six months earlier. 

A large number of villagers were gathered there at the place when the incident occurred. When the villagers heard about the incident, they rushed towards the spot where the women were being beaten up. The CISF jawans also beat the villagers. 

Around 20 of displaced people, who were protesting for the 3,000 acre land which acquired by HEC in 1956-57, were injured and admitted to HEC Hospital. Some of the men and women were more 60-year-old and they were seriously injured. The jawans beaten up them by the buts of the guns. 

Informing the incident Dayamani Barla, noted social activist said: "The hearing on this matter is going on in High Court, Ranchi on this issue. Before any final judgement of HC the jawans of CISF acquired the land and put tent there." 

A large numbers of women protesters also used to gathered there. After this incident, the villagers from Murma, Aani, Jaganathpur, Kute, Labed have organised a protest. 

The CISF acquired the land on the basis of the direction of Union Home Ministry. The Ministry has directed that within the three month of completion of the construction of base camp should be completed. On the condition of anonymity one of the officers said that this land has been taken from HEC. Therefore, the villagers should not be claim on this land. 

Meanwhile, the villagers said that they will stage dharna against this decision. 

Published by HT Syndication with permission from Pioneer. For more information on news feed please contact Sarabjit Jagirdar at htsyndication@hindustantimes.com 

Copyright Pioneer 

Provided by Syndigate.info an Albawaba.com company

--
Priya Ranjan, Ph.D.
Official Internet Wanderer
दिलदार वेताल ऑफ़ इंद्रजाल :)


*************************************************
One Billion overfed and one billion underfed
What we need is a nutrition bridge...

Communicate!  It can't make things any worse.
-From Fortune on LINUX

सर्वे गुणाः कांचनं आश्रयन्ति-भर्तृहरि

All the qualities take shelter at gold.
-Bhartrihari

Charvak is great!
*********************************************

Friday, January 15, 2010

Is Mittal Our God? by Gladson Dungdung


 

Is Mittal Our God?

 

By Gladson Dungdung

www.jharkhandmirror.org

15 January, 2010

 

On 8 January, 2010, the media (forth realm of the democracy) reported us that the global steel giant Arcelor Mittal Company is all set to desert the state of Jharkhand and Orissa, where the company is not yet able to acquire land for its proposed mega steel plants because of the Adivasis' protest against the land acquisition. On the next day, a leading daily of Jharkhand came up with a 'special page' on Mittal company apart from the auspicious front page story, which concludes with the final verdict "the God is ready to desert Jharkhand". Of course, the story is not new as the Jharkhandi media carry out this kind of biased reports for the corporate houses regularly.

 

In fact, when there is any kind of news in favour of the corporate houses, it always gets space in the front page but when the news is against of the corporate interest; it is either reported in unnoticeable manners or did not carried out at all. Ironically, it has been repeatedly done by the forth pillar of democracy, which is expected to be unbiased for the sake of democracy. As far as the Mittal Company is concerned, the media have always played a biased role. In July 2006, when L.N. Mittal the owner of the Arcelor Mittal Company had announced for its departure to the state of Orissa and played a dirty game for pressurizing the state government, the media told us the same thing that the 'God is leaving the state'. The relevance questions are – Is Mittal our God? Are we incomplete without him and does Mittal really care about us?

The media houses have been attempting to coin L.N. Mittal as our (Jharkhandi people) god since the MoU (Memorandum of Understanding) was signed between the company and the Jharkhand government on October 8, 2005. The company has proposed for setting up a mega steel plant with the capacity of 12 million tones per annum at an estimated investment of Rs 40,000 crore. In addition to the steel plant, it has also proposed to set up a 2500 megawatt mega power plant and mining projects in the state. The company requires 25,000 acres of land and 20,000 unit water per hour for the mega steel plant and a township in Torpa-Kamdara region of Khunti and Gumla district. According to the original plan, the steel plant was to come up by the end of 2009 and the production would begin from 2012. Consequently, there would be a mass displacement as 256 villages would be affected therefore the Adivasis are protesting against it.  

However, the right from the beginning the media houses are playing a dubious role. The newspapers regularly reported that the company requires only 12 thousand acres of land and would provide job to 1 lack people in the state. The same newspapers are now reporting that the company requires 25 thousand acres of land for the plant, where 50 thousand people will get the jobs. The newspapers never report us that how the Mittal company has suppressed its own employees and thrown them out of the jobs when the company was in loss. A question comes to my mind is how can L.N. Mittal become our God who did not even spend a pie for India (which he claims as his own country) without self interest in his lifetime?

The Arcelor Mittal Company operates in 60 countries across the world and it has plants in 20 countries. In 2009, the company deserted thousands of its own employees across the globe. The demand of company's steel had gone down to10 percent and its share fell down by 7 percent. The company had to cut production in Canada by 45 percent and axed 9,000 employees. It also cut the job of 1000 employees in lowest cost plant in Poland and shut down one out of its two blast furnaces in west Belgium. The Company was in the process to idle a plant in East Chicago and lay off another 400 workers. The company had total workforces of 3,26,000 which was cut down to 3,15,867 consequently, 10,133 people lost their jobs in the company by the end of October, 2009. Hence, the company has failed in protecting the rights of its own employees. In these circumstances, how can it give us the guarantee of jobs security in India and why our media do not bother to inform us about it? Do media run on coverage package of Mittal?  

Obviously, the Mittal Company has either purchased the media or influence in some other ways, which is of course resulting in the media's exaggeration, manufacturing the consent and convincing people in favour of the company. The media exaggerated Mittal's entry as a great achievement for the state and when the company threatened repeatedly to leave the state, the media coined it as the sky is going to fall in Jharkhad. The announcement of ITI was also projected as it would change the fate of the Adivasis. It was coined in such a manner that without Mittal, Adivasis of the region are beasts, uncivilized and sub-human. Finally, the CSR was propagated as it will change the fate of Jharkhand in over night. All these were done in complete planned manner to get the land by projecting Mittal as Messiah of Jharkhand therefore now when he has announced of shifting the project to the state of Karnata, the media keep telling us that the God is about to desert us therefore we should go to him, plead for not to leave us and surrender our ancestral lands for his steel plant.

Indeed, the Indian democracy is run by the corporate houses and the media is part of it. As far as the people especially the marginalized are concerned, they have only right to vote, which is also snatched by the threat of money, muscle and manipulation power. Of course, the corporate houses were not our god, they are not our god and they will never be our god. If they leave the state, we have nothing to lose but the politicians, who get huge money to buy the votes. However, the recent breaking news on 'coverage package' is the best example of how the forth realm of democracy is also on sale and betrays its own people. Should we still believe on the Media? If the media go on like this, we would have only choice to tell is 'the media is of the corporate, for the corporate and by the corporate. Meanwhile, we are hopping that the Mittal also comes up with his own media house to manipulate the Adivasis' lands but even after that he will never be our god.  

Gladson Dungdung is a Human Rights Activist and Writer from Jharkhand. He can be reached at gladsonhractivist@gmail.com

--
Gladson Dungdung
H R Activist and Writer
Ranchi, Jharkhand
Email: gladsonhractivist@gmail.com
Website: www.jharkhandmirror.org
__._,_.___

Thursday, January 14, 2010

10 hurt in jawan attack: Protests led by Dayamani Barla: Article from The Telegraph: Calcutta



OUR CORRESPONDENT
The protesters at Kute village on Wednesday. Picture by Hardeep Singh

Ranchi, Jan. 13: At least 10 people sustained injuries when Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) jawans lathicharged a mob protesting against a proposal to set up a CISF camp at Kute village in Jagannathpur today.

The incident took place around 8.30am when the villagers assembled after having information of uprooting a Sarna flag they had put on the proposed site to restrain CISF officials from starting the work.

The injured were admitted to HEC Plant Hospital with injuries on heads and legs. But they were reported out of danger. Darshan Mahto, Santosh Mahto, Nepal Baitha and Jeetwa Oroan, who led the mob, were identified among the injured persons.

Superintendent of police (rural) Mohit Bundas confirmed the incident but refused to divulge details saying that the matter was not serious. "The matter is simple. Everything was set right immediately," he said.

Sources, however, said CISF jawans remained in action for an hour and a half. "The jawans did not spare anyone and assaulted all those who came in their way. Even those having nothing to do with the agitation were beaten up," a resident said, adding that they were aggressive as the visit of one of their senior officers was scheduled today.

Sub-divisional officer Rajdeep John, who was deputed to deal with the situation, said the trouble was nothing new. "The trouble started eight months back when 158 acres of land spared by the Heavy Engineering Corporation (HEC) from its 3,500 acres of unused land was transferred to CISF for setting up a camp and CISF officials took the land in their possession to start construction," he said.

Tribal leader Dayamani Barla, who led the villagers, said that it was wrong on HEC's part to sell the land acquired by the state government for industrial purpose. "Unused land should be returned to its owners instead of selling it to CISF," she said.

Barla said the villagers were staging dharna at the proposed camp site since June 6. Last month, they also rooted a Sarna flag to restrain CISF from any construction. "When the CISF jawans today uprooted the flag, the villagers assembled and started agitation prompting CISF jawans to lathicharge," she said.


On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:08 PM, pranjan@gmail.com <pranjan@gmail.com> wrote:
You have been sent this article from The Telegraph, Calcutta by Priya Ranjan.

Message:
Dear Friends: Here is the latest on fights from Dayamani Barla. -Priya Ranjan

10 hurt in jawan attack
Ranchi, Jan. 13: At least 10 people sustained injuries when Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) jawans lathicharged a mob protesting against a proposal to set up a CISF camp at Kute village in Jagannathpur today. |  Read


Page url: http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100114/jsp/jharkhand/story_11981663.jsp#

Send feedback


Wednesday, January 6, 2010

An excellent article for all Adivasi-wannabe-s: The Architect of The Adivasis' Misery by Gladson Dungdung


The Architect Of The Adivasis' Misery

By Gladson Dungdung

06 January, 2010
Countercurrents.org

The India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nerhu, who is also known as the architect of modern India, once said, "Dams are the temples of modern India." According to him, the big dams would address the issues of hunger and poverty of India. Unfortunately, the big dams only created pains, sufferings and sorrows to the owners (mostly the Adivasis; the indigenous people of India) of the lands, which submerged into the temples of modern India. Similarly, the big industries like Heavy Engineering Corporation, Bokaro Steel Limited, steel companies, coal mining and other mining industries created only misery for the Adivasis. Consequently, the Adivasis became landless, daily wage labourers and servants of the bigwigs after losing their land, forest, water and other livelihood resources.

Ironically, the architect of modern India did not create space for the Adivasis in their own modern country. He only inspired them to add more sufferings in their lives for the sake of national interest, saying, "If you are to suffer, you must suffer in the interest of the country." Perhaps, the Adivasis never know what it means by the national interest because they are the people who have always suffered for the national interest but they never enjoyed the fruits of the national interest, they were also not given place in the India history and not even memorized in the holy land of martyrs in the national capital. Needless to say, the architect of modern India did not even bother to count the people who have suffered in the interest of the country, which counts nearly 50 million, who have sacrificed everything for the national interest. Among them 40 percent are Adivasis, 20 percent are Dalits and rest 40 percent are the people of other backward classes. Indeed, the elites never suffer for the national interest as they are born only to enjoy their lives and of course the country protects them in every possible manner.

However, when the issues of the Adivasis are discussed, Nehru is always remembered for his 'Panchsheel for tribal development', which is also called the five pillars of the tribal development. But does his panchsheel work for the Adivasis? Of course, it doesn't. In fact, Nehru himself went against of the principles of Panchsheel and so the Congress party and other Indian rulers. The history suggests that some policies were made only to close the Adivasis tongues. According to Vincent Ekka of the Indian Social Institute, whenever the Adivasis protest against unjust policies of the state, they are given some rights on paper to keep them silent like the barking dogs are treated. Obviously, Nehru's Panchsheel is the best in principle but the worst in practice as it was made for keeping silent to the barking dogs.

1. Non-imposition: The first pillar of Panchsheel says that the Adivasis should be allowed to progress according to their own pace and understanding of the situation. In principle, it seems to be very good but practically, the Indian government went against of it. The most important question is, how can you ask to the Adivasis to go with their pace and understanding if you snatch their livelihood resources in the name of the national interest and also do not provide them any support? The idea of Nehru was just like a day dreaming. The fact is the Adivasis' indigenous method of development was never counted by people of the mainstream of the society and the corporate development model was imposed on them instead. The Indian rulers never walk on their talk for the Adivasis. In the last 6 decades, many policies were made, which displaced, dispossessed and deprived the Adivasis from their livelihood resources but rehabilitation was never a concern for the Indian government at all but of course, they were much concerned for the corporate houses.

2. Respect of tribal customs: The second pillar of Panchsheel also did not work because the Adivasi tradition, culture and customs were never accepted by the Aryan invaders. Only the folk songs and dances of the Adivasis were romanticized in some extent but the tradition, culture and ethos, which are based on community living, equality for all and need based economy were always neglected, depicted as the worst and destroyed in many ways. Similarly, the religion of Adivasis was not recognized by the Indian constitution though many other religions emerged much later in India got recognition in the constitution. As a result, thousands of the Adivasis accepted other religions, religious enmity was created among them and thousands of their sacred groves were destroyed in the name of 'development'. Where is the principle of Panchsheel buried?

3. Development of tribal youth: The third pillar speaks about the leadership of the Adivasis. But the fact of the matter is the Adivasi leadership is not acceptable to the so-called people of the mainstream of the Indian society. The history proves that the Adivasis legend Baba Tilka Manjhi was the first man to fight against the Britishers in 1780 and hanged subsequently but he was not recognized by historians of the mainstream. Similarly, the other Adivasis leaders - Sidho-Kanhu, Birsa Munda, Fulo-Jhano, Nilambar-Pitambar and many others fought against the British government but they were not given space in the India history as they deserved to. Therefore, the Nehru's third pillar doesn't make any sense to the Adivasis. As far as the Adivasis are concerned, they have always groomed, inspired and promoted the youth leadership in their community.

4. Simplicity of Administration: The fourth Pillar of Panchsheel seems to be very well idea as the Adivasis' strong traditional self governance system exists even today, which the Britishers did not able to destroy and finally they accepted it and made laws for its protection and promotion. Ironically, the rulers of modern India including Nehru did not accept the Adivasis' TSG. Instead, he preferred the voluntary agencies for carrying out the development works in the Adivasi regions. The Adivasis' traditional self governance was not accepted precisely because it was a biggest threat to the authorities of Indian rulers. Though the Indian constitution has some provisions for the Adivasis regions as 5th and 6th schedules but there was no attempt made for strengthening of the traditional self governance of the Adivasis. In fact, the Indian rulers wanted the Adivasis regions under their control therefore they imposed numbers of legislations – forest Acts, Laws in the name of the protection of wild life, Land related laws, mining Acts and civil as well as criminal laws. Finally, they captured the natural resources of these regions and exploited it as much as they could.

5. Emphasis on human growth: The fifth pillar of Panchsheel emphasizes on human growth in term of the living standards, which is really appreciable. But as far as the Adivasis are concerned, they are not accepted as human being in India even today. They are always portrayed as uncivilized, sub-human, demons, forest-dwellers and mindless people. The Aryans invaders never treat the Adivasis as equal human beings. The Adivasis are always racially discriminated, exploited and dispossessed. The question is if you take away the livelihood resources of Adivasis without providing them alternatives, discriminated them and treat like sub-human then how can you expect their human growth? The Adivasis regions lack education, health facilities, drinking water, sanitation and shelter even today due to the deliberate inhuman treatment of the Indian rulers with the Adivasis.

Undoubtedly, Nehru is the architect of modern India, but it is also the fact that his modern temples of India, industrialization process and corporate model of development are the main reasons of the Adivasis' pains, sufferings and sorrows. Indeed, he is the architect of the Adivasis' misery. Today, millions of the Adivasis are struggling for their survival, which credit goes to Nehru and his Congress Party. Later on, the right wing and the left wing also added salt on the wounds. Therefore, now we (the Adivasis) must realize that no one can fight for us but we have to fight for ourselves. If we protect our natural resources today, we would be ensuring a better future for our children tomorrow. Before, we go for another movement against displacement, we must pray to our super natural God for not to forgive Nehru because he knew what he did for us. He created misery for us, he ensured that we must suffer and he turned our heaven into hell. His temples of modern India dispossessed us, his temples of modern India exploited us and his temples of modern India created graves for us.

Gladson Dungdung is a Human Rights Activist and Writer from Jharkhand.. He can be reached at gladsonhractivist@gmail.com



--
Gladson Dungdung
H R Activist and Writer
Ranchi, Jharkhand
Email: gladsonhractivist@gmail.com
Website: www.jharkhandmirror.org
__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___



--
Priya Ranjan, Ph.D.
Official Internet Wanderer
दिलदार वेताल ऑफ़ इंद्रजाल :)


*************************************************
One Billion overfed and one billion underfed
What we need is a nutrition bridge...

Communicate!  It can't make things any worse.
-From Fortune on LINUX

सर्वे गुणाः कांचनं आश्रयन्ति-भर्तृहरि

All the qualities take shelter at gold.
-Bhartrihari

Charvak is great!
*********************************************



--
Priya Ranjan, Ph.D.
Official Internet Wanderer
दिलदार वेताल ऑफ़ इंद्रजाल :)


*************************************************
One Billion overfed and one billion underfed
What we need is a nutrition bridge...

Communicate!  It can't make things any worse.
-From Fortune on LINUX

सर्वे गुणाः कांचनं आश्रयन्ति-भर्तृहरि

All the qualities take shelter at gold.
-Bhartrihari

Charvak is great!
*********************************************

Fast against atrocities on tribals


Fast against  atrocities on tribals

        
Last Updated : 03 Jan 2010 07:02:28 AM IST

First Published : 03 Jan 2010 02:05:00 AM IST

CHENNAI: Around 50 people observed a oneday fast on Saturday expressing solidarity with Gandhian activist Himanshu Kumar, who has been fasting to highlight the atrocities against tribal folk in the Dantewada region of Chhattisgarh.

The protestors gathered outside the Memorial Hall and read poems in support of tribal folk. The agitators also condemned State-sponsored paramilitary forces like the Salwa Judum. Noting that over 3,50,000 tribals have been displaced because of various development works and the offensive against Maoists, the protestors sought the implementation of a Supreme Court order directing the Chhattisgarh government to rehabilitate the displaced.

Madhumita Dutta of the Campaign for Peace and Justice, which organised the fast, said tribal people are caught in the crossfire between the government and Maoists.

"Adivasi resistance is pretty older than Maoism and Naxalism.

Adivasis have the right to protest and this fight is for their land and justice," she said. The protest found resonance from the passers-by with many halting to ask where the atrocities were being committed.


--
Priya Ranjan, Ph.D.
Official Internet Wanderer
दिलदार वेताल ऑफ़ इंद्रजाल :)


*************************************************
One Billion overfed and one billion underfed
What we need is a nutrition bridge...

Communicate!  It can't make things any worse.
-From Fortune on LINUX

सर्वे गुणाः कांचनं आश्रयन्ति-भर्तृहरि

All the qualities take shelter at gold.
-Bhartrihari

Charvak is great!
*********************************************